Palabras clave
realidad aumentada
robótica educativa
aprendizaje basado en proyectos
Gamificación
Categorías
Cómo citar
Resumen
La investigación analiza las estrategias de enseñanza activa en el contexto de la educación STEM, abordando metodologías como la gamificación, el aprendizaje basado en proyectos (ABP), la realidad aumentada (AR), la realidad virtual (VR), la robótica educativa y el modelo de aula invertida. Estas metodologías han demostrado mejorar el rendimiento académico, la retención del conocimiento y el desarrollo de habilidades clave, como el pensamiento crítico, la creatividad y la resolución de problemas. A pesar de los beneficios, su implementación enfrenta desafíos significativos, incluyendo la resistencia de algunos profesores y estudiantes. La investigación destaca que la combinación de métodos tradicionales y activos puede mitigar estos desafíos, creando entornos de aprendizaje más dinámicos y equitativos. Asimismo, se sugiere que el éxito de estas estrategias depende en gran medida de la capacitación y disposición de los docentes, además de un apoyo institucional adecuado. Finalmente, se concluye que las estrategias activas son esenciales para preparar mejor a los estudiantes frente a los retos tecnológicos y científicos del futuro.
Referencias
Aji, C., & Khan, M. J. (2019). The Impact of Active Learning on Students’ Academic Performance. Open Journal of Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.4236/JSS.2019.73017
Al-Azawi, R., Albadi, A., Moghaddas, R., & Westlake, J. (2019). Exploring the Potential of Using Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality for STEM Education. 36-44. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20798-4_4
Algerafi, M. A. M., Zhou, Y., Oubibi, M., & Wijaya, T. T. (2023). Unlocking the Potential: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality in Education. Electronics. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12183953
Allendoerfer, C., Kim, M. J., Burpee, E., Wilson, D. M., & Bates, R. (2012). Awareness of and receptiveness to active learning strategies among STEM faculty. 2012 Frontiers in Education Conference Proceedings, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2012.6462327
Aris, N., & Orcos, L. (2019). Educational Robotics in the Stage of Secondary Education: Empirical Study on Motivation and STEM Skills. Education Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/EDUCSCI9020073
Badia, J. D. (2017). Creative Project-based learning to boost technology innovation. @tic: Revista d’Innovació Educativa. https://doi.org/10.7203/ATTIC.18.9019
Deslauriers, L., McCarty, L., Miller, K., Callaghan, K., & Kestin, G. (2019). Measuring actual learning versus feeling of learning in response to being actively engaged in the classroom. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116, 19251-19257. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1821936116
Ferriz-Valero, A., Østerlie, O., Martínez, S. G., & García-Jaén, M. (2020). Gamification in Physical Education: Evaluation of Impact on Motivation and Academic Performance within Higher Education. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17124465
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 8410-8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
Gao, X., & Schwartz, B. (2015). Classroom Implementation of Active Instructional Strategies for Undergraduate STEM Education. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 5, 688-692. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJIET.2015.V5.593
Hakim, L., Sulastri, Y. L., Mudrikah, A., & Ahmatika, D. (2019). STEM Project-Based Learning Models in Learning Mathematics to Develop 21st Century Skills. Proceedings of the International Conference of Science and Technology for the Internet of Things. https://doi.org/10.4108/EAI.19-10-2018.2281357
Hanus, M. D., & Fox, J. (2015). Assessing the effects of gamification in the classroom: A longitudinal study on intrinsic motivation, social comparison, satisfaction, effort, and academic performance. Comput. Educ., 80, 152-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.019
Hativa, N. (2000). Teaching Methods for Active Learning. 111-129. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0902-7_8
Jiang, C., & Pang, Y. (2023). Enhancing design thinking in engineering students with project‐based learning. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 31, 814-830. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22608
Lai, C.-L., & Hwang, G. (2016). A self-regulated flipped classroom approach to improving students’ learning performance in a mathematics course. Comput. Educ., 100, 126-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.05.006
Messadi, T., Newman, W., Fredrick, D., Costello, C., & Cole, K. (2019). Augmented Reality as Cyber-Innovation in STEM Education. Journal of Advances in Education Research. https://doi.org/10.22606/JAER.2019.42002
Meza-Navarro, M., Chávez-Árcega, M. A., Ávila-Hernández, J. C., & Avila-Soto, E. A. (2022). The effectiveness of a course taught in the flipped classroom modality. Revista de Didáctica Práctica. https://doi.org/10.35429/jpd.2022.16.6.18.32
Nelson, C. (2012). Generating Transferable Skills in STEM through Educational Robotics. 433-444. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-4502-8.CH026
Ortiz-Rojas, M., Chiluiza, K., & Valcke, M. (2019). Gamification through leaderboards: An empirical study in engineering education. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 27, 777-788. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.12116
Pan, W., & Allison, J. (2010). Exploring project based and problem based learning in environmental building education by integrating critical thinking. International Journal of Engineering Education, 26, 547-553.
Rayahneh, M. S. Q., & Bataiha, S. S. E. A. (2022). Effectiveness of virtual flipped classroom on science achievement and higher thinking skills development. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v17i9.6996
Semanko, A. M., & Ladbury, J. L. (2020). Using the Reasoned Action Approach to Predict Active Teaching Behaviors in College STEM Courses. Journal for STEM Education Research, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-020-00038-8
Sereeter, B., & Shagdarsuren, L. (2022). Implementation of Robotics Projects for Students. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4040833
Silva, I., Wong, A., Auria, B., Zambrano, D., & Echeverría, V. (2022). Gamification in Engineering Education: Exploring Students’ Performance, Motivation, and Engagement. 2022 IEEE Sixth Ecuador Technical Chapters Meeting (ETCM), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ETCM56276.2022.9935729
Sun, J., & Wu, Y.-T. (2016). Analysis of Learning Achievement and Teacher-Student Interactions in Flipped and Conventional Classrooms. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17, 79-99. https://doi.org/10.19173/IRRODL.V17I1.2116
Talan, T. (2021). Augmented Reality in STEM Education: Bibliometric Analysis. International Journal of Technology in Education. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.136
Tuluri, F. (2017). STEM Education by Exploring Robotics. 195-209. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57786-9_8
Williams, A. E., & O’Dowd, D. (2020). Seven practical strategies to add active learning to a science lecture. Neuroscience Letters, 743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2020.135317
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Derechos de autor 2024 Multidisciplinary Latin American Journal (MLAJ)